Watchtower ONLINE LIBRARY
Watchtower
ONLINE LIBRARY
English
  • BIBLE
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • MEETINGS
  • The Pattern of Judgment
    The Watchtower—1967 | April 1
    • The Pattern of Judgment

      “This is a proof of the righteous judgment of God, leading to your being counted worthy of the kingdom of God, for which you are indeed suffering.”​—2 Thess. 1:5.

      1. What contrasts marked John the Baptist’s ministry?

      JOHN THE BAPTIST began his ministry by preaching: “Repent, for the kingdom of the heavens has drawn near.” He lost no time in gathering disciples around him who shared in the blessings of his ministry, preparing them to be “counted worthy of the kingdom of God.” At the same time he told the unworthy religious leaders that a time of judgment was impending, that “already the ax is lying at the root of the trees,” and that the coming one “will gather his wheat into the storehouse, but the chaff he will burn up with fire that cannot be put out.”​—Matt. 3:1, 2, 7-12; 2 Thess. 1:5.

      2. What is meant by a pattern, and how did Jesus commence such in his ministry?

      2 The coming one, Jesus, as soon as he heard that John had been arrested, began preaching the same message: “Repent, for the kingdom of the heavens has drawn near.” (Matt. 4:12, 17) He there began weaving the pattern of judgment, working out a harmonious design governed by a set purpose, for that is what a pattern is. The first strand, the all-important time element, was marked by the preaching of the Kingdom message. As Jesus said when leading up to the illustration of the rich man and Lazarus: “The Law and the Prophets were until John. From then on the kingdom of God is being declared as good news.”​—Luke 16:16.

      3. As recorded at Luke 16:17, 18, what two strands did Jesus then take up?

      3 Jesus then proceeded to take two more strands, saying first: “It is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for one particle of a letter of the Law to go unfulfilled.” He then added: “Everyone that divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery, and he that marries a woman divorced from a husband commits adultery.” (Luke 16:17, 18) It is unlikely that his hearers saw any connection between those statements. In fact, not until after the Christian congregation had the inspired writings of the apostle Paul did the situation become clear. In the light of those writings we can today examine those two strands and appreciate their designed purpose.

      4. In what way did Jesus fulfill the Law, leading to what realities and final outcome?

      4 Jesus not only kept the Law by perfect obedience to its requirements, he also fulfilled it. As he once said: “I came, not to destroy, but to fulfill,” also saying that down to the last “particle of a letter . . . all things [must] take place.” (Matt. 5:17, 18) Paul wrote that the Law was a “shadow [or, “typical representation”] of the things to come, but the reality belongs to the Christ.” (Col. 2:17; Heb. 8:5; 10:1) In his life and sacrificial death, Jesus caused the big realities to take place. One of the main provisions of the Law was that of sacrifice for sins, especially those on the day of atonement. However, those animal sacrifices were “at no time able to take sins away completely. But this man [Jesus] offered one sacrifice for sins perpetually” by laying down his perfect human life in death. (Heb. 10:11, 12) His death laid the foundation for tremendous changes, with great benefits to those exercising faith therein, beginning with the Jewish members of the “Lazarus” class. Having fulfilled its provisions, then, says Paul, that former Law covenant was taken out of the way and nailed to the torture stake on which Jesus was impaled. (Col. 2:14) But what connection did that have with the next strand, with Jesus’ remark about divorce and adultery?

      5. With what illustration does Paul show that some were “discharged” from the Law?

      5 Having acceptably “offered himself without blemish to God,” Jesus was made “a mediator of a new covenant.” (Heb. 9:14, 15) Paul explains that prior thereto the Jews were bound under their Law covenant as “a married woman is bound by law to her husband while he is alive . . . But if her husband dies, she is free from his law, so that she is not an adulteress if she becomes another man’s. So, my brothers, you also were made dead to the Law through the body of the Christ, that you might become another’s, the one’s who was raised up from the dead, that we should bear fruit to God.” Paul was addressing his brothers of the “Lazarus” class, and it was only such who were “discharged from the Law.”​—Rom. 7:1-6.

      6. What standard did Jesus set respecting divorce, and how would this affect the Pharisees?

      6 In contrast, Jesus’ words on divorce and adultery were addressed primarily to the Pharisees, members of the “rich man” class. They were not free from the Law. True, the Law did embody a divorce provision whereby a man could have more than one living wife, but Jesus went back to God’s original pattern for all who would have God’s favor in, or under, the new covenant. There was no divorce provision for Adam and Eve. So for a Christian to divorce his or her mate, except on the ground of sexual unfaithfulness, and then remarry while the divorced partner is still alive, it means that such a one commits adultery. Hence Jesus’ remarks to the Pharisees, who relied on tradition and the teaching of the then unwritten Talmud on this subject, would only irritate them. It was part of their torment.​—Deut. 24:1-4; Matt. 19:3-9.

      7. How did Jesus anticipate the benefits of his death?

      7 Thus we see the pattern of judgment taking shape. Keep in mind, however, that the changes guaranteed by Jesus’ death began to go into effect before his death actually occurred. The message and work of both John the Baptist and Jesus were based in strong faith on the certainty of Jesus’ carrying out all that was foretold and foreshadowed in the Law and the Prophets. In proof of this, when Jesus instituted the memorial of his death the night before he was impaled, he passed the cup to his disciples, saying: “This cup means the new covenant by virtue of my blood, which is to be poured out in your behalf . . . and I make a covenant with you, just as my Father has made a covenant with me, for a kingdom.”​—Luke 22:20, 29.

      8. What resulted from Jesus’ declaration of the Kingdom message?

      8 No, those changes did not have to wait. The declaration of the good news of the kingdom began to bring about a complete reversal of conditions to both the classes we are considering. From then on both classes died to their former condition and experience, shown in Jesus’ illustration by the death of Lazarus and the rich man. At Jesus’ death in fulfillment of the Mosaic Law the “Lazarus” class died to that Law; and at the following Pentecost they were certified by the outpoured holy spirit as being in the Greater Abraham’s bosom. What happened next, as described by Jesus, and what was signified thereby, we will follow with interest.

      ABRAHAM, THE IMPORTANT FIGURE

      9, 10. (a) What important character did Jesus introduce in his illustration? (b) How did the Pharisees view their relationship with Abraham? (c) In what way were they correct, and in what way incorrect, in their conclusions?

      9 Imagine the scene. In torment in Hades the rich man lifts his eyes, and what does he see? Why, afar off there is that one-time beggar now enjoying the bosom position with Abraham, that is, the favored place, as when one reclines in front of another on the same couch at a meal! (Luke 16:23; see also John 13:23.) Bringing Abraham into the picture was very significant, adding the most important strand to the whole pattern of judgment. Whom does he picture? Remember, Jesus was speaking directly to the Pharisees. They reckoned that they as the religious rulers were the only ones entitled to the bosom position of Abraham. In their eyes the common people did not come into the picture at all. Those rulers said to Jesus in an earlier encounter with him: “We are Abraham’s offspring,” and again: “Our father is Abraham,” and yet again: “We have one Father, God.”​—John 8:33, 39, 41.

      10 From this it is evident that the Pharisees considered that Abraham represented God. In this they were right. Where they were wrong was in claiming sonship with either Abraham or God. In God’s eyes this relationship is determined, not by fleshly descent, but by one’s disposition and works. As Jesus said to them on that same occasion: “If you are Abraham’s children, do the works of Abraham,” and Jesus also said: “You are from your father the Devil, and you wish to do the desires of your father. That one was a manslayer when he began.”​—John 8:39, 44.

      11. Why was faith essential in order to accept Jesus as the Messiah?

      11 While that explains why Jesus pictured that the once rich man was far removed from Abraham, we might wonder why Lazarus, after his death, was pictured as carried straight to the bosom position of Abraham. (Luke 16:22) The emphasis is on faith. Jesus came, not as King, as expected, but in the “likeness of sinful flesh,” “brought just like a sheep to the slaughtering.” (Rom. 8:3; Isa. 53:7) It required real faith to accept him as the Messiah. Some, not the haughty, but the humble, did exercise such faith. They stepped out in faith, just as Abraham did when he “went out [of his own country], although not knowing where he was going.” (Heb. 11:8) They became disciples of Jesus and later, at Pentecost when they received the holy spirit, they became Christians. Of these, Paul wrote: “For all who are led by God’s spirit, these are God’s sons. . . . The spirit itself bears witness with our spirit that we are God’s children.”​—Rom. 8:14-16.

      12. How were those who adhered to faith further blessed?

      12 Paul also said respecting these: “Those who adhere to faith are the ones who are sons of Abraham . . . [and] are being blessed together with faithful Abraham.” How so? To Abraham the grand promise was made that through his seed “all nations of the earth will certainly bless themselves.” That seed is primarily Christ Jesus. But in the riches of God’s undeserved kindness others are privileged to share with Christ as part of that seed. As Paul again said: “You are all, in fact, sons of God through your faith in Christ Jesus. . . . Moreover, if you belong to Christ, you are really Abraham’s seed, heirs with reference to a promise.”​—Gal. 3:7-9, 16, 26-29; Gen. 22:18.

      13. (a) Who comprised the “Lazarus” class in the first instance? (b) How did John and Jesus act as angels toward such?

      13 In summary, then, we see that the members of the Christian congregation, led by God’s spirit, are God’s sons. They are also spoken of as sons of Abraham because of their faith like that of his and because, with Christ Jesus, they constitute Abraham’s seed, God’s instrument for fulfilling his purpose centered in his kingdom. They comprise the “Lazarus” class, commencing with those Jews who were conscious of their spiritual need and who exercised faith when they heard God’s messengers, John the Baptist and Jesus. In fact, John and Jesus acted as angels, or messengers, in bringing those Jews into line for those grand blessings tied in with God’s promise given under oath to Abraham and his seed. No wonder, then, that Jesus pictured Lazarus as at once “carried off by the angels to the bosom position of Abraham.”​—Luke 16:22.

      14. What indication was given that many non-Jews would come into divine favor?

      14 Though the “Lazarus” class, to begin with, was limited to the faithful Jews, it did not stay that way. To a certain Gentile army officer who showed unusual faith, Jesus said: “I tell you that many from eastern parts and western parts will come and recline at the table with Abraham and Isaac and Jacob in the kingdom of the heavens; whereas the sons of the kingdom will be thrown into the darkness outside. There is where their weeping and the gnashing of their teeth will be.” (Matt. 8:5-12) This indicated that many non-Jews, hitherto alienated from God and in a beggarly condition, would come from all parts and be brought right into the bosom of divine favor. As Paul said: “Now the Scripture, seeing in advance that God would declare people of the nations righteous due to faith, declared the good news beforehand to Abraham, namely: ‘By means of you all the nations will be blessed.’” (Gal. 3:8) But as for those who thought that as the natural sons of Abraham they were the undisputed heirs to all the key positions in God’s kingdom, they would find themselves rejected and in torment.

      15. What fine picture of the Theocracy did Jesus give at Matthew 8:11?

      15 The inclusion of Isaac and Jacob together with Abraham in this instance makes a fine picture of the Kingdom, the Theocracy, in its complete setup. Abraham, the father of those who adhere to faith, pictures the heavenly Father, Jehovah, the real source of all the blessings to the nations. Isaac, Abraham’s son, pictures God’s Son, Jesus Christ. Thus when Abraham offered his son Isaac in sacrifice on Mount Moriah, or went to the point of doing so, he foreshadowed how Jehovah offered up his only-begotten Son in actual sacrifice. In turn, Isaac’s son Jacob pictures the Christian congregation. As Jacob received life from Abraham through Isaac, so likewise the Christian congregation receives spiritual life from Jehovah through Jesus Christ. This congregation started off with a remnant of faithful Jews, but about three and a half years after Pentecost the Kingdom good news began to be preached to the Gentiles, starting with Cornelius. Since then the people of the nations have come in from all parts, making up the full number. All of such constitute the “Lazarus” class.

      GOD’S “JUDICIAL DECISION” A “GREAT CHASM”

      16. How did the requests made by the rich man show his real intention regarding Lazarus, and revealing what disposition?

      16 Turning our attention now to the latter part of Jesus’ illustration, taken up with the argument between the rich man and Abraham, we find further expressions of God’s judgment. Note the two pleas made by the rich man. First, he asks that Lazarus be sent to cool his tongue with a drop of water because of the fire. Failing that, he then asks that Lazarus be sent to warn his five brothers about this place of torment. (Luke 16:24-28) Anything to get Lazarus away from Abraham’s bosom, and keep him away! Why did he not ask that the angels be sent on these errands of mercy, seeing how speedily they acted when carrying Lazarus off to Abraham? But, no, it must be Lazarus who must do the running about and act as messenger. From Jesus’ portrayal of the rich man we can only imagine that, if Lazarus had actually visited him and put his finger in his mouth to cool his tongue with a drop of water, the rich man would have got a grip on his finger and kept him there! We know for a fact, as Jesus said, that the scribes and Pharisees strained every nerve to “make one proselyte,” and, having once got him, they made him a ‘subject for Gehenna twice as much so as themselves.’​—Matt. 23:15.

      17. How and why did the religious rulers seek to get relief from the “Lazarus” class?

      17 How ridiculous to think of this taking place literally, but how appropriate to the facts, since we know the classes Jesus had in mind! So we ask, How did the religious rulers seek to get relief, if by only a drop of water, from the “Lazarus” class? Those men would not have been so tormented if the despised followers of Jesus had just followed him and kept quiet. Instead, they were trained and sent forth, first the twelve and then the seventy. They, and not the rulers, were now acting as Abraham’s seed, conveying heaven-sent blessings, curing the sick and preaching the kingdom of God. (Luke 9:1, 2; 10:1, 9) Come Pentecost, and about 120 were empowered by the holy spirit to speak with tongues, and before the day closed a further 3,000 were added to their number. And their boldness! Both publicly and before the Sanhedrin, the apostle Peter and others, such as Stephen, never hesitated to declare the responsibility and bloodguilt of those rulers. (Acts 2:23; 3:14, 17; 4:10; 5:30; 7:52) As Abraham’s natural descendants, the “rich man” class figuratively called out: “Father Abraham, have mercy on me” and make this “Lazarus” class speak instead in our favor, if only a word! How did Abraham reply?

      18. How did Abraham’s replay fittingly portray both sides of the pattern of judgment?

      18 Abraham’s first words merely stated the facts: “Child, remember that you received in full your good things in your lifetime, but Lazarus correspondingly the injurious things. Now, however, he is having comfort here but you are in anguish.” (Luke 16:25) No words were wasted on the rich man. Why not? Because Jesus knew that he was acting as God’s servant in a time of inspection. He was in truth Abraham’s seed and any who called down evil on such seed were cursed by God. (Gen. 12:3) As a class, the “rich man” had had his day, his “lifetime,” when he had ‘received in full the good things’ that he could so easily have dispensed to those in need. But that class showed that they never had any intention of doing so, and now God’s adverse judgment was manifest upon them. God’s favorable judgment was equally manifest on the “Lazarus” class. This was the pattern of judgment, like a design in drawing where one side balances and offsets the other. A strong straight line is drawn right down the middle for emphasis, and this is where the “great chasm” comes in. Note Abraham’s next words to the rich man.

      19. What was the effect and significance of the “great chasm”?

      19 “And besides all these things, a great chasm has been fixed between us and you people, so that those wanting to go over from here to you people cannot, neither may people cross over from there to us.” (Luke 16:26) No fraternizing! The “Lazarus” class could not compromise and speak peace to the “rich man” class. Jesus appreciated that this was a vital strand in the pattern of judgment, and that God’s “judicial decision is a vast watery deep.” (Ps. 36:6) Mark you, it was only as classes that the judgment was final. Neither class, nor any supporting classes, could cross over to the other, but individuals could and did during their lifetime. The apostle Paul was a notable example who, when “formerly in Judaism,” bitterly persecuted the “Lazarus” class. (Gal. 1:13-17) John the Baptist called the Pharisees and Sadducees “offspring of vipers,” and then said: “Produce fruit that befits repentance.” Some of them later did so.​—Matt. 3:7, 8; Acts 6:7.

      20. How did the rich man make a further appeal, and how did this have an application in Jesus’ day?

      20 Knowing the mental attitude of the “rich man” class, Jesus added to his illustration a further argument prompted by the rich man. Trying to ignore or get around that chasm, he pleaded: “In that event I ask you, father, to send him [Lazarus] to the house of my father, for I have five brothers, in order that he may give them a thorough witness, that they also should not get into this place of torment.” (Luke 16:27, 28) Observe that, while addressing Abraham as father, he speaks of a more closely related father, in whose house there are five brothers of his. Jesus knew of the religious house of Judaism, built on human tradition, to which the religious rulers belonged. It was that house that prompted the spirit of bitter persecution, even of murder. Its father was the Devil, who “was a manslayer.” (John 8:44) The five brothers (with the rich man making six, a symbol of the Devil’s organization) represented all the admirers and supporters of the religious rulers, and manifesting the same spirit. The rulers sought relief from being exposed, not only in their own eyes, but also in the eyes of their supporters. If these, their brothers, were figuratively to die and land in the same place, that would but add to their torment. So, in effect, those rulers wanted the “Lazarus” class to quit the position of divine favor and give a “thorough witness,” not of the judgment message, but one that would give the appearance of things being restored to what they were prior to the inspection period, when neither the rulers nor their supporters were exposed to torment.

      21. What was the import of Abraham’s response?

      21 Could that be done? What was Abraham’s response? “But Abraham said, ‘They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to these.’” (Luke 16:29) Nothing else and nothing less than God’s word of truth! It was on that authority alone that Jesus spoke to the people and their rulers, including the judgment message then due. The “Lazarus” class spoke likewise. For example, Peter’s strong, stirring message on the day of Pentecost was based entirely on quotations from the Hebrew Scriptures, from Moses (the Law) and the Prophets and the Psalms. The fact that three thousand immediately responded and were baptized proved that the Hebrew Scriptures in themselves were a sufficient warning and guide to those willing to listen, many of whom were formerly adherents of Judaism.​—Acts 2:41.

      22. (a) What was the rich man’s final plea? (b) What prompted this, and how did Jesus respond to the demand for a sign?

      22 But the rich man had not finished. Showing now his true colors and bluntly disagreeing with Abraham, he said: “No, indeed, father Abraham, but if someone from the dead goes to them they will repent.” (Luke 16:30) In other words, he called for a climactic sign, for someone to rise from the dead, as being the one thing necessary. This would avoid the need either to preach from the Scriptures or to expose the traditions of Judaism. More than once the Pharisees and others asked Jesus to “display to them a sign from heaven.” He answered: “A wicked and adulterous generation keeps on seeking for a sign, but no sign will be given it except the sign of Jonah.” Jonah was a sufficient sign to the Ninevites who, Jesus said, “repented at what Jonah preached, but, look! something more than Jonah is here.” (Matt. 16:1-4; 12:38-41) Jesus preached with far more authority and supporting evidence than Jonah ever did. But the result was as Jesus said: “Unless you people see signs and wonders, you will by no means believe.”​—John 4:48.

      23. How was Abraham’s final word appropriate and true to the facts?

      23 In agreement with this, Abraham replied to the rich man: “If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, neither will they be persuaded if someone rises from the dead.” (Luke 16:31) This was the final word of judgment against the class represented by the rich man and his brothers. If they turn a deaf ear to God’s message in the Scriptures, they will turn a blind eye to God’s messenger, whether it be Jesus or the “Lazarus” class. As Jesus told them: “You are searching the Scriptures . . . that bear witness about me,” and he added that, “if you believed Moses you would believe me, for that one wrote about me. But if you do not believe the writings of that one, how will you believe my sayings?”​—John 5:39, 46, 47.

      24. What warning and encouragement can be gained from the final word spoken in this illustration?

      24 Jesus’ illustration ended on a note of strong judgment, as clear cut as that “great chasm.” It showed God’s righteous “judicial decision” both for and against. It was against the whole household of those who only “heard with annoyance,” and who “shut their eyes; that they might never see . . . and get the sense of it with their hearts and turn back.” (Matt. 13:15) But, thank God, that final word was wholly in favor of the “Lazarus” class. There would never be any need or justification for their leaving or forsaking the place of divine favor with all its comforting provisions and opportunity for feasting at Jehovah’s banquet table.

      25. What questions does this prompt respecting our own day?

      25 Can we draw parallel lines and extend the pattern of judgment in all its salient features to our own day? Does Jesus’ illustration have a pointed message for us? Can we trace two classes in contrast and see how a great change, a reversal of conditions, has taken place under our very eyes? And are we, as individuals, thereby helped to see what we must do to find true riches under God’s favorable judgment?

  • God’s Judgment Makes Manifest the Truly Rich
    The Watchtower—1967 | April 1
    • God’s Judgment Makes Manifest the Truly Rich

      1. Why is the Kingdom message today so forceful?

      IN HIS prophecy concerning the time of the end, Jesus said: “This good news of the kingdom will be preached in all the inhabited earth for a witness to all the nations.” This compares with the message at the first advent, namely, that the “kingdom of the heavens has drawn near.” Today’s message is more forceful. It tells of God’s kingdom actually established, for in the autumn of 1914 C.E. Jehovah installed his King, Christ Jesus, not on an earthly throne, but at the heavenly Mount Zion.​—Matt. 24:14; 4:17; Ps. 2:6; Heb. 12:22.

      2. What procedure will help us in applying the illustration at Luke 16:19-31 to our own day?

      2 The Kingdom message at the first advent marked the beginning of an inspection and judgment period. It was the first strand in the pattern of judgment. As a result, changes began to take place involving two classes, as portrayed in Jesus’ illustration of the rich man and Lazarus. The same is true today. The principles on which the inspection and judgment are based remain the same, but it is worked out on a larger scale. By examining the context of the illustration and other related scriptures we were able to identify the two main characters at the time of the first advent in its first fulfillment. The same procedure will help us to get a clear picture of the present situation. It will also aid us individually to see where we stand in relation to that judgment pattern and its designed purpose.

      3. How can we identify the modern “rich man” class?

      3 We do not have to look far to find the modern “rich man” class. The religious clergy and leaders of Christendom bear a marked resemblance to the Jewish religious leaders of Jesus’ day. Today, as then, these men are in a class to themselves, sacrosanct, reckoned as superior in standing and education, marked by their dress and their many titles. They are rich in positions of influence and prominence, often in good standing with the political rulers, and in some cases exercising a real power behind the throne, or the dictator. These men are also rich religiously in their claims to be exclusively God’s spokesmen in national affairs, also in social and personal problems. In their congregations they are usually the only ones ordained to preach and conduct the services. In some churches these men claim the right to hear confession and grant absolution. Certain ones even claim the right to canonize one as a saint, declaring such a one to be holy and righteous. In very truth the modern “rich man” class seeks to deck himself with purple and linen, enjoying himself from day to day with magnificence.​—Luke 16:19.

      4. Since when has a modern “Lazarus” class become apparent, and how so?

      4 We also do not have to look far to locate the “beggar” class of Jesus’ illustration. Remember how at the first advent this class of lowly and humble ones showed up as soon as the forerunner, John the Baptist, began preaching. So, too, today, before the Kingdom’s establishment in 1914, there was a similar preparatory work done of clearing the way before Jehovah’s representative. (Mal. 3:1) Being on a larger scale, it covered a longer period of about forty years. At once it found those who were aware of their spiritual need, but who, like John’s disciples, became no longer dependent on the orthodox religious leaders for spiritual food. Up till then they, like Lazarus in his ulcerous condition, had been “put at his [the rich man’s] gate” to catch what morsels of food might be dropped. (Luke 16:20, 21) However, Christendom’s clergy, like their former counterpart, have shown scant concern for the common people. They have preferred their traditions and creeds to teachings governed strictly by the Bible. Their table might have the appearance of a magnificent spread, but their food is adulterated.

      CORRECT VIEW OF THE TIME FACTOR

      5. Are we to expect a sudden fulfillment of what was pictured by the death of the rich man and Lazarus?

      5 Then, as told in the illustration, something happened that changed the entire scene. Both men died. That is where the important time element comes in, marked in the fulfillment by the declaration of the Kingdom good news. Yes, death is a climactic event, but do not get the wrong impression. The resultant changes do not occur all at once, affecting everyone simultaneously. It did not happen that way at the first advent. In anticipation of Jesus’ ministry, a work was done and a message declared for six months prior thereto that brought comfort to some and torment to others. Likewise prior to 1914, the message of truth centering around God’s kingdom brought comfort and hope to some, filling the souls of the hungry, but it angered and tormented the clergy, who were not slow to show it. (For details see Jehovah’s Witnesses in the Divine Purpose.) That early work and message were in anticipation of a larger and more clearly defined pattern to be worked out after 1914. Like the morning sun, we do not have to wait for it actually to rise for its penetrating beams to reveal everything in sharp outline. Before that, in anticipation, the welcome light of dawn gives an increasingly clear picture of the landscape before us.

      6. How are we further guided in this respect?

      6 There is another thing. When Jesus gave his illustration, the religious rulers still reckoned to hold on to their high living and pretentious claims. There were also many in a beggarly state who only later experienced the comfort of divine favor. That did not alter the fact that the inspection period had commenced and nothing could change its principles or stop or even hinder its outworking. Jesus spoke accordingly. So today, once Christ Jesus was enthroned on heavenly Mount Zion at the expiration of the Gentile Times in 1914, nothing could stop or delay the proceedings due to take place.

      7. How did Paul identify the Greater Abraham, leading to what fine appeal?

      7 In Paul’s inspired description of the Theocratic setup at “Mount Zion . . . heavenly Jerusalem,” after mentioning the “myriads of angels . . . and the [Christian] congregation of the first-born,” he then names the most important figure, the Greater Abraham, “God the Judge of all.” (Heb. 12:22, 23) Yes, he judges the “Lazarus” class and the “rich man” class and all others. His “judicial decision is a vast watery deep,” a “great chasm,” righteous and inexorable respecting all classes. (Ps. 36:6; Luke 16:26) However, until the final execution of his judgment it is possible for individuals to experience a change of heart and forsake one class and flee to another, even during this inspection period. Do not forget, though, the time is limited. It is in this vein that Paul continues, saying: “See that you do not beg off from him who is speaking.” He goes on to say that the entire present system of things, yes, the symbolic heaven and earth, will be shaken and completely removed. He concludes with this fine appeal: “Wherefore, seeing that we are to receive a kingdom that cannot be shaken, let us continue to have undeserved kindness, through which we may acceptably render God sacred service with godly fear and awe.”​—Heb. 12:25-28.

      8. What final word did Paul add, and what distinction is to be noted?

      8 Paul adds a strong, final word: “For our God is also a consuming fire.” Note the distinction. In his illustration, Jesus told of the fiery condition that men suffer while still on earth, that torments but does not kill. Paul, however, was referring to the final execution of judgment that consumes and destroys all life in the “lake of fire . . . the second death.”​—Heb. 12:29; Rev. 20:14.

      9. How does the prophecy at Revelation 11:7-12 throw further light on the time factor?

      9 Looking at the facts, we find further evidence of the need to consider properly the time factor. Though 1914 marked the birth of the Kingdom, it was not until 1919 that the “Lazarus” class fully experienced their changed condition. (Rev. 12:5) What happened? During World War I the clergy of Christendom were permitted by God to oppress and drive Jehovah’s dedicated servants of the “Lazarus” class into a tight corner of inactivity. As a class, it seemed they were finished and, symbolically, their lifeless corpses were exposed “on the broad way of the great city,” Babylon the Great. Their enemies ‘rejoiced over them.’ Then, under God’s directive decree, a sudden reversal occurred. The “spirit of life from God” restored them to activity, and “they heard a loud voice out of heaven say to them: ‘Come on up here’ . . . and their enemies beheld them.” That is exactly what happened in 1919 to Jehovah’s witnesses who were restored to his favor and exalted service in the interest of his kingdom in the eyes of all, including their enemies of the “rich man” class.​—Rev. 11:7-12.

      10. Since 1919, how have the changed conditions for both classes become more evident?

      10 Since then the changed conditions as foretold have become more and more apparent. Jehovah’s true servants, who had previously wept and were hungry, could now “cry out joyfully because of the good condition of the heart,” due to being fed with Kingdom truths and enriched with Kingdom service. In contrast, it is woe to those professed servants of God who ‘declare themselves righteous before men,’ and like ‘all men to speak well of them.’ These now have cause to “make outcries because of the pain of heart” as they see the “Lazarus” class enjoying great prosperity and being made truly rich, “blessed . . . with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in union with Christ,” the reigning King, and with Jehovah, the Greater Abraham. But the modern “rich man” class are as good as dead and buried as far as having any evidence of divine favor. They reject the Kingdom message proclaimed by the “Lazarus” class. Instead, they advocate such human political substitutes as the League of Nations and the United Nations. Notice now the present-day pleas of the “rich man” class, as indicated in Jesus’ illustration.​—Isa. 65:14; Luke 6:26; 16:15; Eph. 1:3.

      THE PLEAS OF THE MODERN “RICH MAN” CLASS

      11. How do we see the rich man’s plea at Luke 16:24 fulfilled in our time?

      11 In broad outline, the arguments of the modern religious leaders are similar to those of the scribes and Pharisees. In both cases actions speak louder than words. Every effort is made to minimize or offset the vigorous work and message of the “Lazarus” class, even endeavoring to get the work banned where possible. ‘O for Lazarus to be sent to cool my tongue with a drop of water in this blazing fire!’ O for a soothing, complimentary word from Jehovah’s witnesses and, incidentally, get them to quit their position of divine favor! Anything to get them away from Abraham’s bosom!​—Luke 16:24.

      12. As indicated by Abraham’s reply, what has been the result of the plea of the “rich man” class?

      12 In reply to the rich man’s plea you will recall that Abraham merely reviewed the facts, implying that nothing could alter them. That is how it is today. The result of the efforts to get Jehovah’s witnesses to tone down their message or change their stand are just as fruitless as with the early Christian congregation. Jehovah gives the same instruction to the “Lazarus” class today as he did to his servant Jeremiah: “To all those to whom I shall send you, you should go; and everything that I shall command you, you should speak. . . . They will be certain to fight against you, but they will not prevail against you, for ‘I am with you,’ is the utterance of Jehovah, ‘to deliver you.’”​—Jer. 1:7, 19.

      13. How did Jesus point to a wider application when mentioning the great chasm?

      13 You will further recall in the illustration that Abraham next drew attention to the “great chasm.” But did you notice that he did not confine his remark to just the rich man and Lazarus, saying that neither of them could cross over to the other because of the chasm? He speaks of many people on both sides, saying: “A great chasm has been fixed between us and you people, so that those wanting to go over from here to you people cannot, neither may people cross over from there to us.”​—Luke 16:26.

      14. What further classes are seen in the modern fulfillment besides those pictured by the rich man and Lazarus?

      14 By this means Jesus opened the door to a wider application of his illustration. This is particularly true in the modern fulfillment. We know that the rich man had five brothers who, by implication, were headed for the same place of torment. The only creatures Jesus mentioned as being on the side of Lazarus were those who took the trouble to put him, as a needy beggar, at the rich man’s gate, also the dogs who considerately licked his ulcers. There we have the clue. They did something for Lazarus in his need. The rich man did nothing. In another illustration, Jesus tells of those who do good to his spiritual brothers (the “Lazarus” class), even to the least of them, when seen to be in need. These who are glad to render service to Christ’s brothers may be nobodies, or just dogs, in the eyes of the “rich man” class, but Jesus says that in his eyes they are sheep (that is, his “other sheep,” in addition to his “little flock” of joint heirs). (John 10:16; Luke 12:32) On the other hand, those who refuse or fail to render any aid, Jesus likens to goats who suffer the final judgment, the consuming “everlasting fire prepared for the Devil and his angels.” As for the sheeplike ones, they are invited to “inherit the kingdom prepared for you.” Even now, as seen in the vision given to John, they serve God “day and night in his temple,” in close association with the “temple” class or “Lazarus” class, hence enjoying an earthly position of divine favor. These associates are also made truly rich, “because the Lamb . . . will guide them to fountains of waters of life.”​—Matt. 25:31-46; Rev. 7:15-17.

      FURTHER PLEA REJECTED

      15. How is the situation now seen regarding the plea for Lazarus to visit the house of the rich man’s father?

      15 To endure tormenting shame and disgrace is bad enough. It is far worse if those well known to you, your own household, are involved and all alike share in the public exposure. As with the Jewish clergy of Jesus’ day, so now Christendom’s clergy and leaders find themselves in a similar position. They would like to maneuver the “Lazarus” class away from their position of rendering exclusive devotion to the Greater Abraham. Could they not be sent on a mission and, in the words of the illustration, call at the house of the rich man’s five brothers and stay long enough to give them a “thorough witness”? (Luke 16:27, 28) In other words, make a friendly contact with the supporters of Christendom and witness to them, yes, but the kind of witness that would spare them torment. If that should happen, we may be sure that they would be made welcome and would be retained and made a part of the household of the rich man’s father, Christendom’s father, the “god of this system of things,” Satan the Devil!

      16. In what way does Abraham’s reply now have an enlarged fulfillment?

      16 Could that be done? You remember Abraham’s answer: “They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to these.” (Luke 16:29) Today these Hebrew Scriptures have been supplemented by the Christian Greek Scriptures. The “Lazarus” class and their associates, that is, all of Jehovah’s witnesses, now use the entire Bible, telling, among other things, of the reason for God’s judgment on Babylon the Great, her bloodguilt, her friendship with the world, her false doctrines, her shameless luxury, her coming destruction.​—Rev. 17:5, 6; 18:2, 3, 21.

      17. (a) How is the “rich man” class affected by the “thorough witness”? (b) What sign do they demand, and why?

      17 This extended “thorough witness” is not the kind that pleases either Christendom’s leaders or her supporters. When the rich man responded: “No, indeed, father Abraham,” he was really saying “No” to Moses and the Prophets. How true that is today! Jehovah’s witnesses in themselves are not disliked or feared by the religious leaders. It is their message from the Bible that, like a sword, is “powerful by God for overturning strongly entrenched things.” (2 Cor. 10:4; Eph. 6:17) Anything but that! So what is the alternative? A sign! A sign so overwhelming that there will be no call for either reason or faith. “If someone from the dead goes to them they will repent,” pleaded the rich man. (Luke 16:30) The “rich man” class acknowledge the need for repentance on the part of their supporters, but they want it done by a shortcut method. They want a method that will obviate the need to continually “pour out the seven bowls of the anger of God into the earth,” or to continually refer to Moses and the Prophets and the rest of the Scriptures, saying: “It is written.”​—Rev. 16:1; Matt. 4:4, 7, 10.

      18. In what way is Abraham’s final word seen to be appropriate in today’s situation?

      18 There is no changing or evading the pattern of judgment. “If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, neither will they be persuaded if someone rises from the dead.” (Luke 16:31) That was Abraham’s last word. It turned out like that for the Jewish clergy and their supporters. It turns out the same way today. As in the early days, so now, neither the religious leaders nor their supporters can ever say they did not have the opportunity to listen to the Scriptures and their message. They are not forced to listen or be persuaded. They can harden their hearts and shut their eyes. They can oppose and persecute, but they cannot silence the witnesses who enjoy the protection of the Greater Abraham. In the apostles’ days “persecution arose against the congregation that was in Jerusalem . . . [but] those who had been scattered went through the land declaring the good news of the word.” (Acts 8:1, 4) Today the Witnesses may be driven underground, but they still preach.

      19. What greater responsibility now rests on all the religionists?

      19 The responsibility of the religionists is, in fact, greatly increased because “someone from the dead” has been raised up. As Peter said: “God raised this One [Christ Jesus] up on the third day . . . Also, he ordered us to preach to the people and to give a thorough witness that this is the One decreed by God to be judge of the living and the dead.” (Acts 10:40, 42) Yes, a thorough witness was then given, but even more so today since the risen One has become King and Judge in God’s kingdom. Additionally, the “Lazarus” class themselves were figuratively raised from the dead in 1919, as already noted, like Jonah’s deliverance from the belly of the great fish. But all this makes no difference to the household of the rich man and his brothers.

      LEARNING HOW TO BE TRULY RICH

      20. In James’ reference to rich men, what close correspondencies are to be noted as compared with Jesus’ illustration?

      20 The Bible writer James very aptly summed up the theme of our discussion. Under inspiration he wrote: “Come, now, you rich men, weep, howling over your miseries [torment] that are coming upon you. Your riches have rotted, and your outer garments [of linen and purple] have become moth-eaten. . . . Something like fire is what you have stored up [not in future eternal torment after death, but] in the last days.” Then, referring directly to the pattern of judgment, he continued: “Look! The judge is standing before the doors. Brothers, take as a pattern of the suffering of evil and the exercising of patience the prophets, who spoke in the name of Jehovah. . . . You have heard of the endurance of Job and have seen the outcome Jehovah gave, that Jehovah is very tender in affection and merciful.”​—Jas. 5:1-3, 9-11.

      21. How does the drama of Job compare with that of Lazarus?

      21 This latter part gives the bright side of the pattern. For quite a time Job, like Lazarus, was deprived of everything and obliged to scrape the pus from his boils, like the dogs who licked Lazarus’ ulcers. (Job 2:8) Job, too, was at the mercy of his supposed benefactors, his three religious friends, from whom he got about as much relief and help as Lazarus did from the scraps from the rich man’s table. Then came an inspection and judgment from Jehovah that put everyone in his right place. It made manifest who was truly rich. Restored to health and openly shown as having God’s favor, Job was blessed with twice as much as he had before. Additionally, he had a new family of ten fine children, like the “great crowd” of “other sheep” who are gathered to the “Lazarus” class to become “one flock, [under] one shepherd.”​—Job 42:10-17; Rev. 7:9; John 10:16.

      22. In order to become truly rich, what must we do and what must we avoid?

      22 As individuals, we can learn how to become truly rich, even if it means changing our own pattern of life. We can “search for Jehovah . . . while he may be found.” We can avoid the errors of the ‘wicked and harmful man.’ The rich man in Jesus’ illustration never learned anything. He was haughty and self-centered to the end, persisting in viewing Lazarus as just a beggar to be called on to do his bidding. But Abraham countered his pleas by advocating just one thing, “Moses and the Prophets,” the Holy Scriptures. God’s pattern is made very clear therein, showing you how to “return to Jehovah, who will have mercy . . . for he will forgive in a large way.”​—Isa. 55:6, 7.

      23. How does Jesus’ message to the Laodiceans help us in this regard?

      23 Jesus, too, in his message to the “congregation in Laodicea,” showed how you can learn by contrast to appreciate true riches. Though addressed primarily to the “Lazarus” class, the same principles apply to all of God’s people. That congregation had become lukewarm due to its failure to distinguish between true and false riches, and boasted: “I am rich and have acquired riches and do not need anything at all.” They were self-sufficient and self-righteous. But judged by true spiritual values, as Jesus said, they were ‘miserable, pitiable, poor, blind and naked,’ in danger of being rejected, vomited out of his mouth. Note Jesus’ remedy: “I advise you to buy from me gold refined by fire that you may become [truly] rich, and white outer garments that you may become dressed and that the shame of your nakedness may not become manifested, and eyesalve to rub in your eyes that you may see.”​—Rev. 3:14-18.

      24. Jesus’ words: “Buy from me,” call for what requirements?

      24 Ah, yes! “Buy from me,” said Jesus, and pay my price. It is not unreasonable. He invites you to give yourself in devotion and dedication to Jehovah, as he himself set the pattern. Submitting yourself to his training and discipline will produce the ‘tested quality of faith, of much greater value than gold proved by fire.’ “Seek righteousness,” not parading in your own “purple and linen,” but in garments ‘washed white in the blood of the Lamb,’ trusting in the merit of his sacrifice. “Seek meekness,” by being teachable, continually rubbing in the eyesalve, making a real effort to keep your eyes opened to the truths stored up in God’s Word.​—1 Pet. 1:7; Rev. 7:14; Zeph. 2:3.

      25. What fine encouragement did Jesus then give?

      25 To anyone taking this course, Jesus made a most inviting promise: “Look! I am standing at the door and knocking. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come into his house and take the evening meal with him and he with me.” (Rev. 3:20) If willing, you can respond to that personal appeal and become truly rich, enjoying the close position of his favor and acceptance as part of the ‘one flock under the one shepherd.’

      26. What action is now urgently required, based on what quality?

      26 If you come to realize that you have been trapped in Babylon the Great, then respond to that appeal quickly and become one of Jehovah’s people by dedicating yourself to him. The Babylonians are not told to flee, but Jehovah says: “Get out of her, my people.” (Rev. 18:4) It is a matter of faith, a living faith backed up by a course of action in harmony with God’s Word of truth. There is no excuse for ignorance. The chasmlike line of demarcation is clearly drawn. Jesus said: “This is the basis for judgment, that the light has come into the world.” Jesus himself, in his life and teaching, personified and exemplified that “true light that gives light.” Generally, men have refused to come to the light, preferring to practice the vile things that belong to the darkness. They refuse to exercise faith and, said Jesus: “He that does not exercise faith has been judged already.” They prefer to stay in a condemned state in Babylon the Great. It is their own choice.​—John 1:9; 3:18-20.

      27. By taking what course and gaining what position can we enjoy refreshing contrasts both now and in the future?

      27 In contrast, why not come to the light and learn how to be obedient to it, so that your “works may be made manifest as having been worked in harmony with God”? (John 3:21) Thus, instead of having to taste the bitter contrast between life and destruction when that great city is destroyed, or at Armageddon, you can come now into the loving favor and protection of Abraham’s God, Jehovah. From that vantage position you can start experiencing now the happy contrasts that make life so endlessly interesting and worth while, with the wonderful prospect of everlasting life in God’s new system of things with its further promise of delightful contrasts, for its Creator says: “Look! I am making all things new.”​—Rev. 21:5.

  • A Harlot Executed by Her Lovers
    The Watchtower—1967 | April 1
    • A Harlot Executed by Her Lovers

      IT IS not uncommon to read in the newspapers an account about a clandestine affair in which there is a falling out between lovers and the woman is murdered by her paramour. Usually it is a love triangle and jealousy is the motive. Sometimes we read of where a harlot is murdered by her lovers, even stripped naked, tortured and thrown alongside the road. Often this is because of their disgust at her complete filthiness and degradation or because she was disloyal in some scheme of theirs.

      The harlot we are discussing here, however, is no ordinary harlot. She is one that has had kings and rulers as her paramours. Nevertheless, she is executed by them, and not for reasons of jealousy, but because she has deceived them. She has made the world situation much more difficult for the rulers to handle. Actually she leads them into a position where they are found to be fighting against God. They come to the point of disgust and hatred toward her that causes them to want to obliterate her and all thoughts and memories of her.

      This harlot, whose activities have affected the lives of everyone on earth, is the one that was portrayed in vision to the apostle John. She is an international harlot and her activities and her final destiny and execution at the hand of her lovers are clearly described in the record John made of the vision. We read in the book of Revelation that John saw a woman, a harlot named Babylon the Great, riding a scarlet-colored beast. He writes: “And he says to me: ‘The waters that you saw, where the harlot is sitting, mean peoples and crowds and nations and tongues. And the ten horns that you saw, and the wild beast, these will hate the harlot and will make her devastated and naked, and will eat up her fleshy parts and will completely burn her with fire. For God put it into their hearts to carry out his thought, even to carry out their one thought by giving their kingdom to the wild beast, until the words of God will have been accomplished. And the woman whom you saw means the great city that has a kingdom over the kings of the earth.’”​—Rev. 17:15-18.

      A RELIGIOUS EMPIRE OVER THE NATIONS

      As explained in previous issues of The Watchtower, the scarlet-colored beast is the international peace organization now known as the United Nations. The ten

English Publications (1950-2026)
Log Out
Log In
  • English
  • Share
  • Preferences
  • Copyright © 2025 Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Privacy Settings
  • JW.ORG
  • Log In
Share